Legal Opinion

Chappell v. Barkley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Kent. (Adsit, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.

Plaintiff, a physician, brought assumpsit in justice’s court for professional services rendered to defendant’s father in his last illness, and had judgment for $37. Defendant appealed to the circuit, where plaintiff had judgment for $38. The trial in the circuit was had before the court, who found—

“ That plaintiff was the attending physician of W. Barkley, the father of defendant, during the said father’s last illness, and that said Barkley died on or about the 25th day of March, A. D. 1889, and that said professional services commenced February 6, 1889, and continued until said 25th day of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Highland Park v. Grant-Mackenzie Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Armitage v. SaundersMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Crest the Uniform Co., Inc. v. FoleyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API