White v. Berrenda Mesa Water District
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COAKLEY, J.
The plaintiffs shall be referred to herein as “White” and “Aetna”; the defendant as “The District.”
This is an action for declaratory relief in which White and Aetna seek rescission of a construction contract and the return of a bid bond posted by Aetna on behalf of White, the low bidder. The District filed a cross-complaint for damages. Following a trial to the court, judgment was entered in favor of The District on the complaint and on the cross-complaint, and against White and Aetna. The District’s damages were fixed at $42,789. There is no substantial conflict in the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Moffett, Hodgkins & Clarke Co. v. RochesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- M. F. Kemper Construction Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- San Diego Trust & Savings Bank v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Jamison v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Van Meter v. Bent Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- O'Connor v. Old Republic Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Lewis v. Seventeenth District Agricultural Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Architects & Contractors Estimating Service, Inc. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Wil-Fred's Inc. v. Metropolitan Sanitary DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
- Jongepier v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.