Legal Opinion

Valenti v. Valenti

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 26, 1951PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The evidence in this record of the conversations and transactions between the parties prior to the execution and delivery of the deed is sharply disputed and contradictory, and there is no finding by the trial court stating which version thereof is credited. There is no evidence upon which it may be determined whether or not there was an estate tax due upon the father’s estate, and, hence, no proof that there existed a debt or charge which could have been hindered or delayed, nor that there was a creditor who could be defrauded. (Restatement, Trusts, § 63, p. 200; Tiedemann v. Tiedemann, 201…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tiedemann v. TiedemannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Baker v. GilmanNew York Supreme Court · 1868
  3. Tiedemann v. . TiedemannNew York Court of Appeals · 1923

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Palumbo v. PalumboNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Guggenheim v. LieberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  3. Shattuck v. PeckSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  4. Shattuck v. PeckSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  5. Trager v. VigliottiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API