Legal Opinion

Gaede v. District Court ex rel. Eighth Judicial District

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 27, 1984No. 83SA383PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KIRSHBAUM, Justice.

In this original proceeding filed pursuant to C.A.R. 21,1 petitioner, Judith Gaede, seeks relief from an order entered by respondent, Larimer County District Court, requiring all damage issues in this pending civil jury trial proceeding to be tried prior to any determination of liability. We issued a rule to show cause why the relief requested should not be granted, and stayed the trial proceedings. We now make the rule absolute.

I

In 1980, Gaede, as plaintiff, filed a civil action against defendants, Lobar, Inc., Handy Dan Realty Corporation and M & I, Inc., for damages…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United Air Lines, Inc. v. Janice Wiener, as of the Estate of Norton Wiener, Deceased, and Related CasesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  2. Sutterfield v. District Court in and for Arapahoe CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  3. Moseley v. LamiratoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  4. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance Co. of America v. District Court Ex Rel. Seventeenth Judicial District of the State of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  5. Ingram Corp. v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gaede v. DIST. CT. IN & FOR EIGHTH JUD. DIST.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API