Legal Opinion

Valdez v. Chief Judge of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 5, 1994No. Nos. 94-169, 94-224 to 94-229 and 94-728 to 94-730PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In this original proceeding, petitioner prays for the issuance of a writ of common law certiorari on the claim that Administrative Order 93-63, entered by the respondent, is a nullity because it exceeds the proper scope of that administrative authority conferred by Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.050(b). Other similar petitions filed ad seriatim have been consolidated because of the common question presented. During the pendency of the proceedings, it is conceded that the status of all petitioners has changed from the time in which each was entitled to seek pretrial release pursuant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holly v. AuldSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Groover v. WalkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  3. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Blackiston v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  2. State, Department of Juvenile Justice v. SoudDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. 1-888-Traffic Schools v. Chief Cir. JudgeSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  4. Norris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. Hewlett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API