Legal Opinion

Parliament Industries, Inc. v. William H. Vaughan & Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1981No. 2309 and 2310PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge:

This appeal is taken from an order in the trial court dismissing appellant’s petitions to strike two judgments entered by confession. Finding one judgment to be invalid and the other to be excessive, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

On December 8, 1977, the Prothonotary of Lehigh County entered judgment in the amount of $306,365.501 against appellant in favor of appellee. Attached to the praecipe for confession of judgment were four promissory notes in the amount of $87,533.00 with one each maturing on December 28,1977,1978, 1979 and 1980. The notes specified that each was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cameron, to Use v. EynonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Monroe Contract Corp. v. Harrison Square, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. West Penn Sand & Gravel Co. v. Shippingport Sand Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Kolf v. LiebermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Scott Factors, Inc. v. HartleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Parliament Industries, Inc. v. William H. Vaughan & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. George H. Althof, Inc. v. Spartan Inns of America, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Jonnet Development Corp. v. Dietrich Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Township of Middletown v. Fried & Gerber, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Langman v. Metropolitan Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API