Legal Opinion

State v. Sisk

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1950No. 37706PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Beer and light wines, except for personal nse, have been excluded by proper procedure from Monroe County. Section 10208, Code 1942, contains this provision: “Provided, however, that nothing in this section shall prohibit the consumer from possessing or the taking into any county electing to come from under this section said wines and beers for his personal consumption.” Section 10207, Code 1942, made it lawful, when enacted, to possess beer of an alcoholic content of not more than four per centum by weight anywhere in the State. The Section 10208, therefore, in counties electing to bar said…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  2. Kirk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. State v. WillinghamMississippi Supreme Court · 1905
  4. City of Amory v. YieldingMississippi Supreme Court · 1948
  5. State v. BrooksMississippi Supreme Court · 1912

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Common Cause of Mississippi v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Hoyle v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1953
  3. State v. InsleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. ParksMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. CorreroMississippi Supreme Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API