Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Richmond

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 8, 1990No. 89-DR-0104; CA A60921PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Husband appeals from a trial court order denying part of his motion to modify the dissolution judgment and awarding wife attorney fees. He sought, inter alia, to decrease his child support obligation and to be allowed to declare both children as his dependents for tax purposes. He claims that the trial court erred in not modifying the judgment as he requested. We affirm.

The dissolution judgment, entered in 1985, provides for joint custody of the two minor children, one of whom was adopted. The children live primarily with wife, although they stay with husband every Tuesday and Thursday night,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gleason v. MichlitschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. In re the Marriage of ButcherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. In re the Marriage of LutzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. In re the Marriage of MyersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re RanesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. In re the Marriage of MaddenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. In re the Marriage of RossiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. In re the Marriage of MorrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. In re the Marriage of RaeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API