Legal Opinion

Pannell Kerr Forster InterNational Assn. LimIted v. Quek

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 2, 2001No. 99-15526, 99-16751; D.C. No. CV-97-01077-HGPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM1

This case involves a trademark license dispute over the right to use the Pannell Kerr Forster (“PKF”) name and style within the state of Hawaii. Pannell Kerr Forster International Association B.Y. (“Association BY.”) and Pannell Kerr Forster International Limited (“PKFI”) hold various international and U.S. trademark licenses relating to the PKF name and style. Both Pannell Kerr Forster Consulting (“PKFC”) and The CPA Consulting Group, Inc. (“PKF Hawaii”) are licensed by PKFI to operate under the PKF name and style. PKFC claims to be licensed to use the PKF name in Hawaii, while…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Murray Weiner,plaintiff-Appellant v. San Diego CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Fuku-Bonsai, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lamorak Insurance Company v. Certain London Market Company ReinsurersDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API