Legal Opinion

State v. Quackenbush

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 30, 2004No. XX-020489-CR, XX-020505-CRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

¶ 1. Christine Quackenbush and Michael Lee move separately for extensions of the time to file a notice of intent to pursue postconviction relief. The main issue is whether our analysis of their motions is determined by State v. Evans, 2004 WI 84, 273 Wis. 2d 192, 682 N.W.2d 784. We conclude that Evans does not determine our analysis. In addition, we conclude that the motions show good cause for the requested extensions. Therefore, we grant the motions.

I. BACKGROUND

¶ 2. A brief review of the postconviction process under Wis. Stat. Rule 809.30 (2001-02) 1 will set the context for these motions.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
State v. KnightWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
State v. EvansWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
Keith S. Betts v. Jon E. LitscherCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Lorenzo D. Kyles v. William PollardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014