People v. Autosure, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward H. Lehner, J.
The principal issue raised in these two proceedings (consolidated herewith for disposition) is whether companies engaged in the business of selling contracts to repair vehicles damaged as a result of accidents are unlawfully engaged in the business of insurance. The court holds that they are and enjoins the defendants from continuing to engage in such activities.
These proceedings were instituted by the Attorney-General and Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York to permanently enjoin respondents, pursuant to Executive Law § 63 (12) and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re FeinsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Ollendorff Watch Co. v. PinkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Electronic Realty Associates, Inc. v. LennonNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- Higger v. Radziminsky & Zeger, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
3Cited by3 opinions
- American Auto. Ins. Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- In Re American Motor Club, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1993
- People v. Nationwide Asset Services, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2009