Legal Opinion

People v. Peppers

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 30, 2004No. 1-03-2543PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson

This garden-variety drug case raises a fourth amendment question that has commanded the attention of federal and state courts across the nation. The same answer keeps coming up — the government can require a convicted felon to undergo a blood or saliva test for submission to state and national DNA databanks without individualized suspicion that the felon has committed some other crime. That is our answer in this case.

Following a bench trial, defendant Willie Peppers was convicted of possession of a stolen motor vehicle and possession of a controlled substance. The trial court sentenced…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. People v. EnochIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. People v. ButlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. People v. FosterAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. People v. RedmondAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. People v. RadfordAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  5. People v. FortAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API