Gunner v. Elmwood Dodge, Inc.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
What the parties present for decision, a question of jurisdiction under the “long-arm” statute (G. L. c. 223A), was raised by the allowance of a motion to dismiss the action under Mass.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2), 365 Mass. 755 (1974).
An affidavit and a deposition submitted by the plaintiff in opposition to the motion to dismiss (see Good Hope Indus., Inc. v. Ryder Scott Co., 378 Mass. 1, 3 [1979]; Balloon Bouquets, Inc. v. Balloon Telegram Delivery, Inc., 18 Mass. App. Ct. 935 [1984]; Smith & Zobel, Rules Practice § 12.9 [1986 Supp.]), and the facts pleaded in the complaint (taken for these purposes…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Tatro v. Manor Care, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Digital Equipment Corp. v. Altavista Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
- Heins v. Wilhelm Loh Wetzlar Optical Machinery GmbH & Co. KG.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
- Sigros v. Walt Disney World Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Kleinerman v. MorseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.