Legal Opinion

KALB Et Ux. v. FEUERSTEIN Et Ux.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 7, 1940No. Nos. 120, 121PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

Appellants are farmers. Two of appellees, as mortgagees, began foreclosure on appellants’ farm March 7, 1933, in the Walworth (Wisconsin) County Court; judgment of foreclosure was entered April 21, 1933; July 20, 1935, the sheriff sold the property under the judgment; September 16,1935, while appellant Ernest Newton Kalb had duly pending 2 in the bankruptcy court a petition for composition and extension of time to pay his debts under § 75 of the Bankruptcy Act (Frazier-Lemke Act), 3 the 'Walworth County Court granted the mortgagees’ motion for confirmation of the sheriff’s sale; no stay of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Moore v. DempseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Elliott v. Lessee of PeirsolSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  5. Davis v. WechslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kalb v. FeuersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Pratt v. Hollenbeck, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Erie County1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API