Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Buetz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 22, 1938PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Queens county settling account of administrator and dismissing objections to the account, and order denying motion to vacate decree reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, motion to reopen the proceeding granted, without costs, and matter remitted to the Surrogate’s Court for a further hearing and determination. In our opinion, the ruling that appellant was bound by the answers of the administrator was erroneous. He was an adverse party and the appellant was at liberty to endeavor to elicit admissions from him without being bound by his answers.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Koester v. . Rochester Candy WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. The People v. . SnyderNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  3. Stebbins v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. George v. GalaniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of AsterioNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API