Legal Opinion

Rueschemeyer v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided April 1, 1996No. 95-133-AppealPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This matter came before the Supreme Court for oral argument pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised by this appeal should not be summarily decided. After hearing the arguments of counsel and examining the memoranda submitted by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown and that this matter should be summarily decided.

The defendant, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (defendant), appeals from an order entered by a Superior Court motion justice concerning an insurance policy it issued which covered a vehicle operated…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Aldcroft v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  2. Amica Mutual Insurance v. StreickerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
  3. Malo v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
  4. Bartlett v. Amica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991
  5. Sentry Insurance Co. v. CastilloSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990

4Cited by16 opinions

  1. Boradiansky v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co v. HatfieldKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Jenkins v. City of ElkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2012
  4. American States Insurance Company v. Joann LaFlamSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
  5. Henderson v. Nationwide Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API