Legal Opinion · Dissent

David M. Powers v. State of Iowa

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 11, 2018No. 16-1650Published

1Dissent

MANSFIELD, Justice (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent. K.P. allegedly made a false claim she was sexually assaulted after the trial . The majority assumes this posttrial event could constitute newly discovered material evidence under Iowa Rule of Criminal Procedure 2.24(2)(b )(8) and Iowa Code section 822.2(1)(d ) (2016).4 Thus, the majority moves on to whether the defendant was entitled to discovery. However, because the event occurred after the defendant's trial and would at most have been used to impeach K.P.'s testimony at trial, it is not newly discovered material evidence. Therefore,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harrington v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  2. Glendale More Jr. v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  3. State v. MartinezIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. BilkeArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Aguilera v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API