Legal Opinion
County Executive of Rensselaer v. New York State Department of Transportation
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 7, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrew Iii, J.
Proceeding initiated in this Court pursuant to Railroad Law § 91 to review a determination of respondent which denied petitioners’ request to alter and rehabilitate a railroad crossing.
Petitioners commenced this proceeding pursuant to Railroad Law § 91 alleging that the public interest required the alteration and/or rehabilitation of a railroad bridge located on Muitzeskill Road in the Town of Schodack, Rensselaer County. The bridge in question was constructed in or about 1923 and spans the tracks of Consolidated Rail Corporation’s "Boston Line”. A public hearing was held before an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Boston & Albany RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Town Board v. Fitchburg RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Schaghticoke v. . Fitchburg Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- People ex rel. Terminal Railway v. Board of Railroad CommissionersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- People Ex Rel. Terminal Railway v. Board of Railroad CommissionersNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
3Cited by2 opinions
- Middletown & New Jersey Railroad v. State of New York Department of TransportationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Middletown & New Jersey Railroad v. State of New York Department of TransportationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013