Legal Opinion

Weintraub v. Quicken Loans, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 5, 2010No. 08-2373PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge DUNCAN and Judge LEGG joined.

OPINION

NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge:

Prior to closing on a loan to refinance their principal residence, Rita and Barry Weintraub attempted to exercise the right to rescind given by the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1635(a), and demanded a refund of their $500 deposit. The lender, Quicken Loans, Inc., refunded the balance of the deposit after deducting the costs of a credit report and an appraisal but refused to refund the entire $500.

The Weintraubs commenced this action, seeking a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Koons Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc. v. NighSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Household Credit Services, Inc. v. PfennigSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Nigh v. Koons Buick Pontiac GMC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  4. Linda Ann Baxter v. Sparks Oldsmobile, Inc. And Ted PrivetteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Burson v. CappsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  2. Guy v. Carrington Mortgage Services (In re Guy)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2016
  3. Burson v. CappsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  4. McDonald v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2024
  5. Pinson v. Pioneer WV Federal Credit Union (In re Pinson)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API