Legal Opinion

Harzinski v. Village of Endicott

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

In Harzinski v Village of Endicott: On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order modified, with costs to appellants, to the extent of reinstating the provision of the order of Supreme Court, Broome County, declaring that plaintiffs are entitled to salary increases given to active firemen and, as so modified, affirmed. Appellants, disabled firemen, are entitled to salary increases where, as here, such increases were negotiated after the award of the disability allowance (Matter of Mashnouk v Miles, 55…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mashnouk v. MilesNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Farber v. City of UticaNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Farber v. City of UticaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Kuzma v. City of BinghamtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API