Legal Opinion

Madigan v. Trace Construction, Inc.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 20, 2007No. 06-P-1800PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.

This is an action brought under G. L. c. 254, § 15A, for summary discharge of several mechanics’ liens encumbering the plaintiff’s real estate. The plaintiff claims that since the general contractors entered into construction contracts with a tenant of the plaintiff, and not the plaintiff, neither the general contractors nor the subcontractors may encumber the plaintiff’s real property and, therefore, he was entitled to a discharge of the liens. A judge of the Superior Court dismissed the complaint, holding that the summary remedy of G. L. c. 254, § 15A, was not the appropriate method of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. National Lumber Co. v. LeFrancois Construction Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  2. Hammill-McCormick Associates, Inc. v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  3. Loring v. Commissioner of Public WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  4. Tremont Tower Condominium, LLC v. George B.H. Macomber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. Golden v. General Builders Supply LLCMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Trace Construction, Inc. v. Dana Barros Sports Complex, LLCMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  2. Fid. & Deposit Co. of Md. v. Beyond Constr., Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API