Yarborough v. President & Directors of the State Bank
Supreme Court of North Carolina
¡>From Franklin. At June term, 1828, of Franklin County Court, the Sheriff of that county had in his hands the following writs oijierifadas, all, except those issued by a Justice of the Peace, tested of the preceding term of that Court, viz., No. 1. In favor of the State Bank against Thomas Yarborough, Lark Fox and James 0, Jones, issued the Míe 1 "tb March, 1.828, No. 75. In favor of the same Plaintiff against Thomas Yarborough and Henry Y. Ilouze, issued the 4th of April,…
Read the full summary
¡>From Franklin. At June term, 1828, of Franklin County Court, the Sheriff of that county had in his hands the following writs oijierifadas, all, except those issued by a Justice of the Peace, tested of the preceding term of that Court, viz., No. 1. In favor of the State Bank against Thomas Yarborough, Lark Fox and James 0, Jones, issued the Míe 1 "tb March, 1.828, No. 75. In favor of the same Plaintiff against Thomas Yarborough and Henry Y. Ilouze, issued the 4th of April, ° yQm jn faVor of Samuel Robinson, against Thomas Yarborough, also issued on the 4th of April, 1828. No. 10. In favor of…
1Opinion of the Court
FROM FRANKLIN. No. 1. In favor of the State Bank, against Thomas Yarborough, Lark Fox and James C. Jones, issued 17 March, 1828.
No. 75. In favor of the same plaintiff, against Thomas Yarborough and Henry Y. Houze, issued 4 April, 1828. (24)
No. 76. In favor of Samuel Robinson, against Thomas Yarborough, also issued on 4 April, 1828.
No. 10. In favor of Richard F. Yarborough, against Thomas Yarborough, issued 27 March, 1828.
No. 8. In favor of Sylvester Sledge, against Thomas Yarborough, issued 27 March, 1828.
All of these were original writs, except No. 10, which was an alias fi.fa. the original…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Pearson v. . FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1814
- McIver v. . RitterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1864