Legal Opinion

Price v. Carmack Datsun, Inc.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1985No. 60446PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ward

The question here is whether the complaint of David N. Price stated a cause of action for retaliatory discharge. The circuit court of Vermilion County held that it did, and the defendant, Carmack Datsun, Inc. (Car-mack), appealed to the appellate court. That court reversed (124 Ill. App. 3d 979), and we granted the plaintiff’s petition for leave to appeal under our Rule 315 (94 Ill. 2d R. 315).

The plaintiff’s complaint against Carmack, filed January 5, 1982, contained these allegations: The defendant Carmack was in the business of selling new and used automobiles in Danville. Price was a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Palmateer v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Barr v. Kelso-Burnett Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Price v. Carmack Datsun, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Turner v. Memorial Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Beckman v. Freeman United Coal Mining Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Rodgers v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  4. Gonzalez v. Prestress Engineering Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Geary v. Telular Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API