Legal Opinion

Pinacle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 2, 1991No. 90-64Published

1Per curiam

As correctly agreed to by the state, the habitual offender sentence imposed below is vacated solely upon the ground that the trial court failed, as is required under the applicable statute, section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1987),1 to make specific findings of fact showing that an enhanced prison term is required for the protection of the public. Moreno v. State, 550 So.2d 1172 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). The cause is remanded for resentencing in accordance with Moreno. There is no merit in the appellant’s other contentions on appeal.. This requirement was eliminated by a subsequent statutory…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arnold v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Donald v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Garvin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  4. Moreno v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API