Legal Opinion

People v. Sweeper

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1984PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Myriam J. Altman, J.

Jury selection in this homicide prosecution was completed on November 14, 1983, with testimony scheduled to commence the following morning. Later that day the key prosecution witness, Bobby Edmonds, was murdered. The People consequently seek the admission of Mr. Edmonds’ Grand Jury testimony. The defendant contends that such admission would deprive him of his Sixth Amendment right of confrontation.

The Sixth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States provides that, in a criminal trial, a defendant has the right to confront the witnesses against…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holtzman v. HellenbrandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. People v. Siu Wah TseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. United States v. MastrangeloDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1983
  4. United States v. PapadakisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. GeraciNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Geraci v. SenkowskiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
  3. People v. CottoNew York Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. SmallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. People v. SweeperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API