Gildemeister & Co. v. Peruvian S. S. & Floating Dock Co.
District Court, W.D. Washington
In Admiralty. Suit by Gildemeister & Co., against the Steamship Iquitos; the Peruvian Steamship & Floating Dock Company of Callao (otherwise known as the Campania Peruana de Vapores y Dique del Callao), claimant. On objections to jurisdiction. Dismissed.
1Opinion of the Court
NÉTERER, District Judge.
Libelant seeks recovery from respondent ship because of damage occasioned to cargo of sugar shipped from port in Peru to Port Vancouver, B. C., because of unseaworthiness of vessel, improper stowage, lack of dunnage, and proper ventilation. The ship sailed in June, 1921, and discharged cargo July 15, following. The ship was attached in the port of Seattle and released under usual stipulation. It appears that all parties to the transaction and the ship are alien, the parties citizens of Peru, and the ship of Peruvian registration.
*384[1] Objection is filed to the court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The BelgenlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Ex Parte MuirSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- The PesaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Goldman v. Furness, Withy & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1900
- Pinckney v. The HungariaDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1889
3Cited by9 opinions
- Canada Malting Co. v. Paterson Steamships, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Murillo Ltda. v. the Bio Bio, the Paraguay, the ArgentinaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- Sociedad Brasileira De Intercambio Comercial E Industrial, Ltda. v. S. S. Punta Del EsteDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1955
- Cerro De Pasco Copper Corp. v. Knut Knutsen O.A.SDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- Canada Malting Co. v. Paterson Steamships, Ltd.District Court, W.D. New York · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.