Legal Opinion

Freeny v. Hall

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 23, 1894PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Distress warrant. Before Judge Fish. Lee superior court. September term, 1892.

1Opinion of the Court

Simmons, Justice.

1. Hall claimed that Hooks offered to negotiate to bim a note-purporting to be signed by one Freeny, payable to Hooks’ wife, for rent, and that he declined to purchase the note until he could see Freeny and ascertain if he had signed it; that shortly thereafter he saw Freeny and asked him if he had signed the note, and *707Freeny replied that he had; that he asked Freeny if it was given for rent, and he replied that it was; and that he (Hall) thereupon purchased the note from Hooks, taking a written assignment of it. The note falling due, Hall, as transferee, had a distress…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hefner v. VandolahIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Tompkins v. PhilipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  3. Reedy v. Brunner & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1878

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ducros v. Peoples Drug StoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  2. Dingfelder v. Georgia Peach Growers ExchangeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  3. Palmer v. McNattSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  4. First National Bank v. Marshall & Ilsley Bank of MilwaukeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Akers v. KinneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API