Legal Opinion

Seaborne-Worsley v. Mintiens

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 20, 2018No. 26/17PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

Under the "controversial doctrine of imputed negligence," 1 the negligence of one individual may be imputed to another who was otherwise without fault. In the realm of automobile torts, the doctrine has been applied to ascribe the negligence of a permissive driver of a car to the owner of the car if the driver operates the car negligently while the owner is a passenger. In that context, the doctrine of imputed negligence is based on the fiction that the owner is able to control the actions of the driver and therefore is responsible for any misstep of the driver.

In the past, the doctrine…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Boblitz v. BoblitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. Weber v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. City of Bowie v. MIE, Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Coleman v. Soccer Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Kiriakos v. Phillips Dankos v. StapfCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Montanary v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API