Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Hadden

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 20, 1994No. 91C31895; CA A77161PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Husband appeals from the property division provisions of a dissolution judgment allowing the parties to keep the growth in their own retirement accounts. Wife cross-appeals, assigning error to the trial court’s decision to distribute the remaining property equally. On de novo review, ORS 19.125(3), we affirm on the appeal and on the cross-appeal.

The parties had been married for two and one-half years at the time of the dissolution, and they had lived together for two years before their marriage. During that four and one-half year period, they made a number of large joint purchases, including…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of PiersonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. In re the Marriage of KampmannCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. In re the Marriage of KampmannCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. Debord v. DebordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. In re the Marriage of DebordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of KunzeOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In re the Marriage of RolieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API