Legal Opinion

Nimmer v. Heavican

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided June 6, 2019No. 4:18-cv-03123Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA JOHN C. NIMMER, Plaintiff, vs. 4:18-CV-3123 HON. MICHAEL G. HEAVICAN, HON. STEPHANIE F. STACY, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER HON. LINDSEY MILLER-LERMAN, HON. WILLIAM B. CASSEL, HON. JONATHAN J. PAPIK, HON. JEFFREY J. FUNKE, HON. JOHN R. FREUDENBERG, and MARK A WEBER, in their official capacities, Defendants. The plaintiff alleges a claim pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

"to address deprivation, under color of state law, of rights, privileges, and immunities secured to Plaintiff by the Constitution." Filing 1 at 5. The defendants move for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.