Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Astrue

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided October 22, 2012No. Civil Action No. 11-cv-30282-KPNPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS and DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO AFFIRM THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER (Document Nos. 11 and 14)

KENNETH P. NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

This is an action for judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”) regarding an individual’s entitlement to Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1383(c)(3). Kent Alexander Taylor (“Plaintiff’) asserts that the Commissioner’s decision denying him such benefits — memorialized in a- July…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Victor J. Irlanda Ortiz v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  5. Maria S. Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Olmeda v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014
  2. Sanchez-Ortiz v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014
  3. Agostini-Cisco v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2014
  4. Howard v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
  5. Snay v. SSADistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2014

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API