Legal Opinion

Youngman v. Town of Oneonta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 10, 1923Published

1Dissent

Kiley, J. (dissenting):

Claimant’s intestate was superintendent of highways of the town of Oneonta, N. Y., which town, outside of the city of Oneonta, over which he had no jurisdiction and in which he was not expected to do any work or labor, is a small political division in which it is the custom and in this case the fact, that the town superintendent does manual labor along with the men whom he directs in the course of their employment. The word “ superintendent ” is synonymous with inspector, overseer and manager. (Webster’s Dictionary.) When Charles D. Youngman was elected superintendent…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Palmer v. . Van SantvoordNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Claim of Bowne v. S. W. Bowne Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Short v. Town of OrangeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  4. Claim of Conley v. Upson Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  5. Claim of Otterstedt v. Lehigh & Hudson River Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API