Legal Opinion
W.G. Barr Management, LLC v. ContekPro LLC
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 15, 2024No. 3:23-cv-02257Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 W.G. BARR MANAGEMENT, LLC, Case No. 23-cv-02257-TSH 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 9 v. ATTORNEYS’ FEES; ORDER RE: BILL OF COSTS 10 CONTEKPRO LLC, Re: Dkt. No. 65 11 Defendant. 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Pending before the Court is Defendant ContekPro, LLC’s motion for attorneys’ fees. ECF 15 No. 65. Plaintiff W.G. Barr Beverage Co. (d/b/a Two Pitchers Brewing Co., “Two Pitchers”) filed 16 an Opposition (ECF No. 67) and ContekPro filed a Reply (ECF No. 71). ContekPro has also filed 17 a bill of costs (ECF No.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Gates v. DeukmejianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Martin Gonzalez, Sr. v. City of MaywoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Scott Fischer v. sjb-p.d. Inc., a California Corporation, Dba Cedar Creek Inn Svenja Bienlefeld Michael ViliunasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.