St. Joseph Loan & Trust Co. v. Studebaker Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtSparks, Circuit Judge
(after stating the tacts as above).
We are first met with appellee’s contention that appellants’ bill of exceptions is not properly in the record. That contention is based on the assumption that the time for presenting and filing it expired on July 20, 1932, and was not enlarged, and the hill was not signed by the court until October 6, 1932. The record, however, shows that on July 20, at the request of both parties, the time was enlarged to August 20, 1932. The bill had been served and filed on July 30, but in the meantime, the ease had been docketed in this court on July 20. Hence when the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Kellogg Bridge Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Wood v. Fort WayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Compania Transcontinental De Petroleo v. Mexican Gulf Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.