Legal Opinion

Yair Jackoby v. Geico General Ins Co

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 9, 2015No. 12-16917Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

Yair Jackoby (“Jackoby”) appeals the order of the district court denying him summary judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of GEICO General Insurance Company (“GEICO”) in Jackoby’s action for underinsured/uninsured motorist (“UIM”) benefits. Jackoby maintains that the anti-stacking provision in his GEICO automobile insurance policy is ambiguous and did not preclude the stacking of multiple insurance coverage limits when he was injured in an accident while riding a bicycle.1 We review the district court’s grant of GEICO’s motion and the denial of Jackoby’s motion de novo.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gee v. Tenneco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. Benchmark Insurance Co. v. SparksNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Bove v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  4. CRM Collateral II, Inc. v. TriCounty Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Century Surety Co. v. Casino West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API