Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 2, 1937No. Claim No. 24089Published

1Dissent

Hill, P. J. (dissenting).

Under the Workmen’s Compensation Law employment continues and the law applies while the employee is going, with reasonable dispatch, from the place of his employment (Matter of Lynch v. City of New York, 242 N. Y. 115), but it applies only “ until a suitable opportunity has been given to leave the place of work.” (Matter of Field v. Charmette K. F. Co., 245 N. Y. 139.) It is a question of fact whether the relation of employer and employee exists. (Matter of Dubinsky v. Kofsky, 266 N. Y. 631.)

Plaintiff’s intestate came into the building and remained fifty minutes after…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of Field v. Charmette Knitted Fabric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Matter of Lynch v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Matter of Dubinsky v. KofskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API