Legal Opinion
State v. Gumm
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 30, 1995No. 1995-0756PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 73 Ohio St.3d 413.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. GUMM, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Gumm,
1995-Ohio-24.] Criminal law—Aggravated murder—Death penalty upheld, when—Evidence— What the prosecutor may comment upon at penalty stage of capital trial. Subject to applicable Rules of Evidence, and pursuant to R.C. 2929.03(D)(1) and (2), counsel for the state at the penalty stage of a capital trial may introduce and comment upon (1) any evidence raised at trial that is relevant to the aggravating circumstances specified in the indictment of…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- State v. BrooksOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. VanderhorstOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. GlennOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. WarnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.