Legal Opinion

In Re Baycol Products Litigation

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided November 10, 2004No. MDL 1431PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, District Judge.

On June 10, 2004, the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee (“PSC”) submitted a Letter of Request for Judicial Assistance Pursuant to the Hague Convention (“Letter Request”). By this Letter Request, the PSC seeks to obtain documents from Dr. Raffa-ele Guariniello, the Italian prosecutor that investigated Bayer beginning in September 2001. Specifically, the PSC seeks approximately 100,000 documents that Dr. Guariniello obtained in July 2002 from Bayer AG, Milan relating to the withdrawal of Baycol from the worldwide market. In their letter accompanying the Letter Requests, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. United States District Court for the Southern District of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Alma Torreblanca De Aguilar v. Boeing Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1992
  3. Tulip Computers International B v. v. Dell Computer Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Autotech Technology Development, Incorporated v. Carbopress SpaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
  2. Fairview Health Services v. Armed Forces Office of the Royal Embassy of Saudi ArabiaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
  3. McCarthy v. JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API