Legal Opinion
Paragould Cablevision, Inc. v. City of Paragould
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 15, 1991No. 90-1820PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge.
Paragould Cablevision (Cablevision) appeals from the district court’s grant of the City of Paragould’s (Paragould) and its Light and Water Commission’s (CLW) motions to dismiss Cablevision’s claims pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). 739 F.Supp. 1314. Cablevision charged Paragould with *1312violations of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act,1 infringements of its first and fourteenth amendment rights, and breach of contract. The district court dismissed the federal claims with prejudice and then dismissed Cablevision’s state-law contract claims without prejudice pursuant to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- City of Lafayette v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Four T's, Inc., Doing Business as Dollar Rent a Car of Little Rock v. Little Rock Municipal Airport CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Bloom v. Hennepin CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
- Paragould Cablevision, Inc. v. City Of ParagouldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Barnstead Broadcasting Corp. v. Offshore Broadcasting Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1994
- Wooster Industrial Park, LLC v. City of WoosterDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014