Legal Opinion

Barr v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 12, 1995No. 94-1152PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLF, Judge.

Barr appeals from a judgment and sentence after a conviction for armed robbery of a motor vehicle. Appellant contends that his departure sentence was invalid because it was based on criminally punishable conduct for which he was not convicted. The record clearly shows that the departure was based on appellant’s conduct surrounding his apprehension for the armed robbery. Because this conduct endangered the lives of many innocent persons and demonstrated a flagrant disregard for the safety of others, it constituted a clear and convincing reason for departure.

Appellant was charged by…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Garcia v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Ward v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  4. Felts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barr v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. Caldwell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API