Legal Opinion

State v. Eubanks

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 27, 1905No. 15,580PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Twenty-Second Judicial District' Court, Parish of Bast Baton Rouge; George Kent Eavrot, Judge. William Eubanks was convicted of larceny and appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.

The defendant was tried before the judge without the intervention of a jury, on an information charging him with the larceny of seven sacks of cotton seed of the value of $15, and was found guilty by the court.

Defendant moved in arrest of judgment on the grounds that he had been denied his *429constitutional right of trial by jury, and that Act No. 107, p. 161, of 1902, is unconstitutional in so far as it purports to grade larceny as a misdemeanor.

This motion in arrest was overruled, and the defendant was sentenced to be imprisoned in the parish jail for a term of six months.

From this sentence…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. DalcourtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PlummerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  2. State v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  4. State v. HarwickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  5. State v. WallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API