Legal Opinion

Horner v. David Distributing Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 6, 1980No. 11313PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court’s dismissal of their petition for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. Plaintiffs contend that the petition stated a cause of action for breach of implied warranty for failure to sell a replacement part for a furnace and that pursuant to Article I, Section 14 of the Missouri Constitution, a remedy must be afforded for every injury to persons or property.

In considering whether plaintiffs’ petition states a cause of action, we take as true all factual allegations of the petition. Plaintiffs allege that in 1975 they…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. National Refining Co. v. SeehornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  2. Schulte v. Missionaries of LaSalette Corp. of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  3. Breckner v. PrestwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Meester v. RooseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  5. State Ex Rel. H. K. Porter Co. v. NangleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Renaissance Leasing, LLC v. Vermeer Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  2. Simpson v. KilcherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  3. Harrell v. Total Health Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  4. Doe v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. Ballmer v. BallmerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API