Arnold v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The appellant challenges the trial court’s order summarily denying his postconviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. Because the trial court failed to attach portions of the record that demonstrate the appellant’s motion was successive, we reverse.
In his motion for postconviction relief, the appellant alleges that the trial court failed to orally pronounce him a habitual felony offender as required by Ashley v. State, 850 So.2d 1265 (Fla.2003). The trial court summarily denied the appellant’s motion finding that it was successive because the appellant had…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ashley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Maddox v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wright v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017