Legal Opinion

Smith v. Vial

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 25, 1977No. 19299PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUITTARD, Chief Justice.

In this appeal from a temporary injunction restraining a trustee’s sale, the principal question is whether the plaintiff failed to show a probable injury. We hold that probable injury is sufficiently shown and sufficiently recited in the court’s order. Accordingly, the order granting the temporary injunction is affirmed.

The record shows that at the time of the hearing an earlier action was pending in one of the district courts of Travis County, in which Annie Isbell, the present appellant, sought to recover the balance due on a promissory note given as part payment for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Irving Bank & Trust Co. v. Second Land Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Ex Parte Lee LillardTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Johnson v. AveryTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Day v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Starnes v. Holloway, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  2. Swanson v. GrassedonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Crestview, Ltd. v. Foremost Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Crestview, Ltd. v. Foremost Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API