Ray v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Judge.
Appellant appeals his conviction of selling marijuana in violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act.
1. Appellant urges the trial court erred in unduly restricting defense counsel’s closing argument to the jury. “ ‘Counsel should have ample latitude to argue what has transpired in a case from its inception to its conclusion, . . . and the range of such comment is necessarily in the discretion of the trial judge. ’ [Cit.] ” City Council of Augusta v. Hamilton, 56 Ga. App. 859, 861 (194 SE 244) (1937). See also Hinton v. State, 138 Ga. App. 702 (4) (227 SE2d 474) (1976).…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brown v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- State v. LukeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Bixby v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Rucker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Maynard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Ridgeway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Lucas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985