Roubideaux v. Cox
District Court, D. South Dakota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DONALD J. PORTER, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against two caseworkers of the South Dakota Department of Social Services, [DSS] in their individual and official capacities, the DSS itself, and the state of South Dakota. Plaintiff requested damages in the amount of $20,000, alleging that defendants deprived plaintiff of public assistance, under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children [ADC] program, in violation of plaintiff’s due process rights. Before the trial, the court dismissed the action as to the state and the DSS, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- John P. McNamara v. J. C. Moody, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Bettye B. Pickett and Thea S. Spatz v. Newt Milam, Joe Harrison and Tom LindseyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Visser v. MagnarelliDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fox v. ViceDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2010