Fair v. Martin
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Shiawassee; Smith, J. Assumpsit by Robert C. Fair against John W. Martin for goods sold and delivered. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This action was commenced in justice’s court to recover from the defendant the value of 102 barrels of apples, which plaintiff claims to have sold him for $1.65 per barrel. The plaintiff had judgment in that court. The defendant appealed to the circuit court, where he prevailed. On the trial there the plaintiff testified as to the contract as follows:
“I had some business relations with him [defendant] *613regarding the sale of apples last fall. I had one meeting with him in Durand. Mr. Martin talked with me in Durand about buying the apples, and I asked him what he was paying. He said, ‘$1.55,’…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Forrest v. O'DonnellMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by6 opinions
- Alabama Consolidated Coal & Iron Co. v. HealdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Better Valu Homes, Inc. v. Preferred Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Figueroa v. PuterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- LARSTAN INDUSTRIES v. Res-Alia Holding Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Alabama Consolidated Coal & Iron Co. v. HealdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.