Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Palmer & Hopper

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1873PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Warren county; the Hon. Arthur A. Smith, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scholfield

This was an action of assumpsit, by the appellees against the appellant, to recover the value of certain plows alleged to have been sold and delivered by them to him. The jury rendered their verdict in favor of appellees. Appellant moved for a new trial, which was overruled, and judgment was given upon the verdict by the court below. To this appellant excepted, and brings the case before us by appeal. But two questions are argued, and we will notice them in the reverse order to that in which they are presented in appellant’s argument.

It is contended that the court erred in permitting Hopper,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Holbrook v. NicholIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Smith v. KahillIllinois Supreme Court · 1855

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sands v. KageyIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Roberts v. CorbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Gray v. MeekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API