Lang v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Mew York, borough of the Bronx, second district, dismissing the complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtPendleton, J.
The action was for damages for personal injuries resulting from negligence. There was evidence to *196show that plaintiff, her husband” and daughter and a guest had paid their fare and were on the platform of the underground road at the Ninety-sixth street station for the purpose of boarding one .of defendant’s trains. The-' train stopped at the station and while at a standstill the party-proceeded to enter by the middle entrance door, which was open for that purpose; the guest first, the husband next, plaintiff third and the daughter following immediately after. The guest, plaintiff and husband…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morrison v. . B. S.A.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Dean v. Third Avenue RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Laverty v. Interurban Street Railway Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906
- Sann v. H. W. Johns Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Foden v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sheridan v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1959