Legal Opinion · Dissent

Burgo v. Illinois Farmers Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 11, 1972No. 56250Published

1DissentJustice Burman

I would affirm. The sole issue is whether the condition precedent contained in the policy is to be enforced. As set forth in the majority opinion, liability of the insurer under the uninsured motorist provisions of the policy is dependent upon the insured (a) filing suit against the uninsured motorist, (b) reaching agreement with the insurer as to the amount due under Part II (the uninsured motorist coverage) of the policy, or (c) formally instituting arbitration within one year from the date of the accident. The parties agree that none of these three steps was taken within the one year…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Green County v. QuinlanSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HoladaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  3. Dreher v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  4. McMahon v. Millers National InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  5. People v. ColeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API